<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tomb Raider Anniversary Edition &#8211; First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.8bithero.co.uk/games/tomb-raider-anniversary-edition-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.8bithero.co.uk/games/tomb-raider-anniversary-edition-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>Autonomous Gamer Geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 06:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerri</title>
		<link>http://www.8bithero.co.uk/games/tomb-raider-anniversary-edition-first-impressions/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://8bithero.moonnio.co.uk/?p=326#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Kate: Legend was good but way too short. You could finish it in the amount of time it took to get 1/3rd the way through the first Tomb Raider.
It was good fun though and was constantly a action filled game throughout. It didn&#039;t have boring sections where you were stuck and couldn&#039;t go any further like the original Core games.

Anthony: Your probably right about the cash in. It&#039;d probably be better if they could just make a sequel to Legend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate: Legend was good but way too short. You could finish it in the amount of time it took to get 1/3rd the way through the first Tomb Raider.<br />
It was good fun though and was constantly a action filled game throughout. It didn&#8217;t have boring sections where you were stuck and couldn&#8217;t go any further like the original Core games.</p>
<p>Anthony: Your probably right about the cash in. It&#8217;d probably be better if they could just make a sequel to Legend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.8bithero.co.uk/games/tomb-raider-anniversary-edition-first-impressions/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://8bithero.moonnio.co.uk/?p=326#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I was never a fan of Tomb Radier, the clunky controls always frustrated me. I have not played legends but I heard that Crystal Dynamics fixed the controls, which makes me interested in playing legends and this new one. This one still sounds like a quick cash in to me though. I guess we&#039;ll see soon enough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was never a fan of Tomb Radier, the clunky controls always frustrated me. I have not played legends but I heard that Crystal Dynamics fixed the controls, which makes me interested in playing legends and this new one. This one still sounds like a quick cash in to me though. I guess we&#8217;ll see soon enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.8bithero.co.uk/games/tomb-raider-anniversary-edition-first-impressions/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://8bithero.moonnio.co.uk/?p=326#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Legend did feel way too short. I&#039;m looking forward to this anniversary edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legend did feel way too short. I&#8217;m looking forward to this anniversary edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
